The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.
Factom leadership and decision making vote
This may be obvious to everyone, but just to ensure it's explicitly highlighted for the group, and the process understood ...
[B]For the vote [/B]question "[I]Should ANOs continue to remain part of the community decision making process?[/I]"
[B]A "[U]NO[/U]" vote would [U]completely disenfranchise ANOs[/U] from community governance decisions making[/B].
[B]This would [U]not[/U] take effect immediately [/B]at the conclusion of the vote, but would instead occur once "something else is adopted" and functionally in place. As indicted [URL='https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Sj4t3Rswlc4b0RC_0p1sAovbQJZjWd0aa2NU6x4w9JA/edit?usp=sharing']here in the provided decision tree[/URL], if ANOs choose to remove themselves from governance decision making (forum votes, grants, ANO accessions/removals, etc.) , the [U]next planned vote provides[/U] multiple rankable [U]choices on what entity would assume total decision authority[/U] for the community.
[B]A "[U]YES[/U]" vote [U]keeps ANOs[/U] as [U]part of[/U] the community governance [U]decisions making[/U] process[/B].
[B][U]And in the next planned vote[/U], [U]ANOs[/U] will [U]rank[/U] [/B]multiple [U]options on how[/U] ANOs will remain involved in decision making.
These options include ANOs retaining complete (100%) decision authority, or alternatively, several options on sharing decision authority with another entity(ies), such as a multi-member council, single director, or something else.