Post #31220

7c5e3989ac58c1917e30e10882c68ca90c8847b57a868d0620c996b1c299140d
db1cf47c7243c2c653a6ccc38b9360d884c59ad42d0c68bd159f15be668a264e
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1609782451,"post_data":{"edit_count":1,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"29cb817b4ba56cfccf6a7b7a4a4247f5eff92244b7d77430d7b607b042257f3179311f044b6044caaa5855e64111cdc1a2c3fcca5320816b22a8f33a46430340","node_id":52,"post_date":1609782276,"thread_id":5628,"user_id":11},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/factom-leadership-and-decision-making-vote.5628\/post-31220"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Factom leadership and decision making vote
Thanks for that clarity, [USER=32]@Jason Gregoire[/USER]. I had read the entire thread and still wasn't certain.

On the basis of that, the clear answer for me is to retain ANOs as part of governance but to minimise their influence via either a council or a director.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top