Post #31221

Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Factom leadership and decision making vote
[QUOTE="Niels Klomp, post: 31211, member: 8"]
Happy New year to all.

[USER=164]@Mike Buckingham[/USER] could you please confirm and if applicable change the above?

As mentioned before, right now the poll question is open to interpretation and that would be okay if every single ANO would have read the thread up to the above post, but that will not happen in reality. As long as different interpretations are possible the poll has little to no meaning at all.

Hi Niels,

I’d like to join you in wishing a Happy New Year to all of our readers!

Hopefully the responses above from @vidale, @Jason and me clearly indicate our GIG position that this is not just about day to day decision making, however that is defined, but about the degree to which ANOs will remain involved in making decisions, as defined in community governance, for the protocol. As such the question, as reiterated by @vidale above, remains as: [B]“Should ANOs continue to remain part of the community decision making process?”[/B]
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.