Post #31223

7c5e3989ac58c1917e30e10882c68ca90c8847b57a868d0620c996b1c299140d
281e5725bdf8224c7390b8d439ab3aa20fc0ee50502e2bf22c7bfc085cd5e0bf
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1609782602,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"125f48a766d9b5526e3bf0e67e99e4a59265a198ef8cfe735aef3a3758c00aec89a894c0e94d563b89738d8af8df6408cd81c64466f6f02c52c43e253dd4c249","node_id":52,"post_date":1609782602,"thread_id":5628,"user_id":11},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/factom-leadership-and-decision-making-vote.5628\/post-31223"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Factom leadership and decision making vote
Yes, I believe it would, [USER=164]@Mike Buckingham[/USER].
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top