Post #31225

7c5e3989ac58c1917e30e10882c68ca90c8847b57a868d0620c996b1c299140d
49c9f8cc4f9d5ad9ba27d54f26df2a29fb18f892bc52ccb409b3e5e7c68c90ad
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1609789872,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"625c54003da8aaabb84aca189aa7ed4a1efb2098cb1387e959d8747ddecb3d0c8aeb884e0065fedac7742d0cb0a78f81a1a6d67d2929be2eff8b0c2f3673400b","node_id":52,"post_date":1609789872,"thread_id":5628,"user_id":117},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/factom-leadership-and-decision-making-vote.5628\/post-31225"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Factom leadership and decision making vote
If the choice is between a (hopefully) benign dictatorship structure of sorts or having the ANOs involved in the slightest form, then I would also think a the latter (i.e. a 'Yes) is better.

However, even if there is a majority for a yes, we will still have to settle not only on the leadership structure, but also on who has which mandates for which decisions - it is not covered by the decision tree and it will have a very big impact.

Consider the table below. With a 'No' outcome a leadership structure, whether a director or a council, will make every single decision. With a Yes we can limit ANOs to be involved in a few key decisions or have them involved in everything. Personally I would prefer something along the lines of Structure 1, whereas I have the impression that others prefer something like Structure 2. To me structure 1 would give us decisiveness, without sacrificing ANO contol over key components of the protocol.

[TABLE]
[TR]
[TD][B]Decisions[/B][/TD]

[TD][B]No[/B][/TD]

[TD][B]Yes - Structure 1[/B][/TD]

[TD][B]Yes - Structure 2[/B][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Changing the Factom logo[/TD]

[TD](ANOs 0%, Leadership 100%)[/TD]

[TD](ANOs 0%, Leadership 100%)[/TD]

[TD](ANOs 68%, Leadership 32%)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Approving a small grant[/TD]

[TD](ANOs 0%, Leadership 100%)[/TD]

[TD](ANOs 0%, Leadership 100%)[/TD]

[TD](ANOs 68%, Leadership 32%)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Approving a large grant[/TD]

[TD](ANOs 0%, Leadership 100%)[/TD]

[TD](ANOs 0%, Leadership 100%)[/TD]

[TD](ANOs 68%, Leadership 32%)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Committing the protocol to a partnership[/TD]

[TD](ANOs 0%, Leadership 100%)[/TD]

[TD](ANOs 0%, Leadership 100%)[/TD]

[TD](ANOs 68%, Leadership 32%)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Rebranding the protocol[/TD]

[TD](ANOs 0%, Leadership 100%)[/TD]

[TD](ANOs 0%, Leadership 100%)[/TD]

[TD](ANOs 68%, Leadership 32%)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Changing the tokenomics[/TD]

[TD](ANOs 0%, Leadership 100%)[/TD]

[TD](ANOs 100%, Leadership 0%)[/TD]

[TD](ANOs 68%, Leadership 32%)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Changing who is in charge of Leadership[/TD]

[TD](ANOs 0%, Leadership 100%)[/TD]

[TD](ANOs 100%, Leadership 0%)[/TD]

[TD](ANOs 68%, Leadership 32%)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Adding/removing an ANO[/TD]

[TD](ANOs 0%, Leadership 100%)[/TD]
[TD](ANOs 100%, Leadership 0%)[/TD]

[TD](ANOs 68%, Leadership 32%)[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top