Post #31227

7c5e3989ac58c1917e30e10882c68ca90c8847b57a868d0620c996b1c299140d
c3b89dc6aa6f94501b3d9d437559faeef77a9171ebef897da86f022e960163aa
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1609790758,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"39a012552d11eeb8e678415122fcf2638ad45bba04bd8d250e49d4fdfa7499cbc2c304bac6f2505473a0bfa06f5bf621c62c42997fdd73bb97cfd2875705853a","node_id":52,"post_date":1609790758,"thread_id":5628,"user_id":8},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/factom-leadership-and-decision-making-vote.5628\/post-31227"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Factom leadership and decision making vote
Am I the only one that notices that there is assymetry between the approaches and hence why you should not ask the questions in current order?
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top