Post #31228

7c5e3989ac58c1917e30e10882c68ca90c8847b57a868d0620c996b1c299140d
3636fdce5ef69f5f0f924ef92da958103eed24e4c3b83e6f7a6e01b0079f5d7c
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1609842462,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"3d6aa9e310ea214a27259332b98d29f7432f2ef64bf1a1b456993acb869a5661c25af6595369e0c4eb4eba67e10565c94eb5f7f2aaa8c3fba44eda20262ac4ef","node_id":52,"post_date":1609842462,"thread_id":5628,"user_id":227},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/factom-leadership-and-decision-making-vote.5628\/post-31228"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Factom leadership and decision making vote
I personally think this thread asks for the crucial question that we need to answer before detailing a governance proposal. It clarifies the direction we want to follow and saves us time by avoiding sterile debates.

If you want what you just described you need to vote YES and then choose the director approach. Then, once these macro options are defined we will define and set up the final structure.
If the vote NO passes then you have to compromise and choose the structure you are the best comfortable with.

At the end, we will be all clear on what general approach is preferred by ANOs and what approach is worth spending time on it to be detailed.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top