Post #31280

39c531bd8491d39f5855c3a69f6339f1d622fbe1771879cdf7e3f6c0249463e8
9911afed481b5b09f7cbe7c06bf4137f786bea4f8d999ffc5442525ed6361482
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1610548707,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"015ece707612f37fcc096317f4dea07f1d8f75d9f8c2e625b49ed9aaa2f7eec055cb2df115774d9c32689fff5e5ba8a447181da3fc660f02e4d460676ff1bf78","node_id":52,"post_date":1610548707,"thread_id":5633,"user_id":175},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/proposed-factom-roadmap-for-2021.5633\/post-31280"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Proposed Factom Objectives
I also think this is a net positive, and I don't see the need to be an agitator on topics that are meant to inspire some positivity and common ground.

In the event of a leadership stalemate that leaves us without a clear prioritization and hierarchy, we can at least walk away with a [B]community-agreed[/B] roadmap along which lines of effort are pursued and backed by new tokenomics.

[QUOTE="Matt Osborne, post: 31279, member: 9"]
At the ANO Summit almost three years ago, we passed a simplified roadmap that we were unable to execute [B]even with Guides[/B] at the helm and more resources.
[/QUOTE]

If Guides were ever tasked with roadmap execution and strategy, then that's news to me.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top