Post #31281

39c531bd8491d39f5855c3a69f6339f1d622fbe1771879cdf7e3f6c0249463e8
50018040e2e4e7e1251c7574b8e46cd21fc8a32470b0ab0d1162b4658e690e9b
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1610549546,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"2cb883f84de23811b18f45a16aa4c3fbb2fa1de8953433c2cde66c10a2413c0822ee15dfe5d53f670bcb8770d08234deb5cbd6a73e4096b6f9f3aeac28a01715","node_id":52,"post_date":1610549546,"thread_id":5633,"user_id":9},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/proposed-factom-roadmap-for-2021.5633\/post-31281"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Proposed Factom Objectives
OUTSIDERS: "Do you have a roadmap?"

US: "Yes, here it is"

OUTSIDERS: "Umm, this doesn't really seem attainable. How do you plan to achieve it?"

US: "We have no viable plan. We also admit that there's zero chance we actually accomplish it. It's really just a wishlist. But, it made us all feel warm and fuzzy, so we passed it."

That pretty much sums it up.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top