Post #31282

39c531bd8491d39f5855c3a69f6339f1d622fbe1771879cdf7e3f6c0249463e8
1545f082cf5addca50f43f0b8d3f2bc0a737487da0434270298bf3a80c21a5e5
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1610552080,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"42e5f2d59c248206d7b45657848f34f1e3728523e8b4ad326a86ad2e476167f6d7d8fb7a80c7a2805b98e233131c4ecaee01e1e83bc622626bccd4e9e4fed205","node_id":52,"post_date":1610552080,"thread_id":5633,"user_id":84},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/proposed-factom-roadmap-for-2021.5633\/post-31282"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Proposed Factom Objectives
Shouldn't a roadmap contains targets that are achievable within a time frame? It is like someone made a picollage of all the buzzwords this industry has. This roadmap is overly optimistic, maybe that is how it is supposed to be? Outside of the governance proposals, how many items of this roadmap could be achievable this year? I personnally would just like to see items that are achievable on this roadmap.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top