Post #31287

39c531bd8491d39f5855c3a69f6339f1d622fbe1771879cdf7e3f6c0249463e8
527f3dfb92dfd9664930c79e4482edbc8379ec3e1dc58f9dbaaef2bbedccb70b
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1610558423,"post_data":{"edit_count":1,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"2d3560fd83827489de90379a5be0e26b0082099d5c78d5206867bc3761c2ee54ff03f8a4be8e8f3ba4cf90444e8e2221f5a0f440ea89a7b68203cebc5ec34392","node_id":52,"post_date":1610558383,"thread_id":5633,"user_id":8},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/proposed-factom-roadmap-for-2021.5633\/post-31287"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Proposed Factom Objectives
[QUOTE="PaulSnow, post: 31284, member: 29"]
Kinda the story around many projects, like ethereum. Constantly revised roadmaps mostly tracking needed efforts.


We had a long talk once upon a time with Jonathan Mohan about this. You may or may not have been on the call. His observation was to follow ethereum's approach. Identify issues, name a project/effort to deal with them, then continue to work on what you have to work on.

Problems you don't have to solve presntly are not problems really. Just categorize them and work on them by priority.

(Likely butchering what he said, but that's the gist of his view)

Anyway, this is a small thing. A doable thing. A non-controversial thing.

Doing things is good. If we break up the things we need to do into little doable things and do them, we start making progress.
[/QUOTE]
There is a difference between overselling when you get a question for a feature with actual people developing and having a wishlist without these resources ;)

If we treat this as a simple Wishlist that is very much open to changes no matter what approach we are going down I am okay with it. If this really is meant for overseeing execution by whatever leadership we come up with then I am very much opposed to it.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top