Post #31295

39c531bd8491d39f5855c3a69f6339f1d622fbe1771879cdf7e3f6c0249463e8
111820ced67d50c48cd3259c3f00352933d229812cf3f0494528d02e5c22b7bc
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1610574145,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"ff63874db048fcc299514640ccbdaf9b32bb5168cfb32c270787926de8732b93a8c8277f36bbc6b60dac400c36bd48f885b05b663c4da79f75dd45ac8785957d","node_id":52,"post_date":1610574146,"thread_id":5633,"user_id":9},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/proposed-factom-roadmap-for-2021.5633\/post-31295"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Proposed Factom Objectives
@vidale
So your logic is that is ok to deceive people via a wildly exaggerated, unattainable "roadmap" because we have unfinished grants?

This isn't a "roadmap" for 2021. It's a wishlist. This issue is easily rectified by calling it something more accurate than "roadmap."
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top