Post #31297

39c531bd8491d39f5855c3a69f6339f1d622fbe1771879cdf7e3f6c0249463e8
210dabdc2f28ea2b6474eb512706498006190973662da29416999b9478e5ef17
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1610577368,"post_data":{"edit_count":2,"last_edit_date":1610577368,"last_edit_user_id":32,"message_sha512":"d61c588fcab55cf6a8e83f6b1398e18693061a0259cd6e0251ad3906bb60596c9a21f515616bb687db390a89994a15dbf23db262b7d2b9b86b77c63864445b0e","node_id":52,"post_date":1610575439,"thread_id":5633,"user_id":32},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/proposed-factom-roadmap-for-2021.5633\/post-31297"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Proposed Factom Objectives
[QUOTE="Matt Osborne, post: 31295, member: 9"]
This isn't a "roadmap" for 2021. It's a wishlist. This issue is easily rectified by calling it something more accurate than "roadmap."
[/QUOTE]

Your post are becoming hard to take seriously. It is a plan of action; identified key functions and initiatives for the community to cooperate towards in pursuit of success.
If you would be more happy with "Factom Objectives 2021" I'll gladly modify it's title and we can move on.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top