Post #31298

39c531bd8491d39f5855c3a69f6339f1d622fbe1771879cdf7e3f6c0249463e8
f9b32981b16a1cb0cb1e7398e7b6b9321ac67e5e85f0aff14c9aeeac7e62eb20
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1610575550,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"fe4634d1d26217d16a7a4b49954ce2a0b71f34497f013f52609d5c356dc85ac71f9746d0953d48f5d3e57f7cbc70e531547d27d8e73219dcb34abf4f93714af1","node_id":52,"post_date":1610575550,"thread_id":5633,"user_id":175},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/proposed-factom-roadmap-for-2021.5633\/post-31298"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Proposed Factom Objectives
I support Factom Objectives 2021.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top