Post #31312

39c531bd8491d39f5855c3a69f6339f1d622fbe1771879cdf7e3f6c0249463e8
b66b0c1a71f235b623c5b04b803923557ee9c2e3c4762fb3d80cc8b8831d6bf4
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1610687158,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"0c944d8f70d50c4f3ea01e549e1a200877365b6587776987160811bd8717946902ec40d42cd4e0369849f9e0b137025e9b1f6b8c24602d5af5a5a772a492aef6","node_id":52,"post_date":1610687158,"thread_id":5633,"user_id":10},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/proposed-factom-roadmap-for-2021.5633\/post-31312"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Proposed Factom Objectives
I have to echo the concerns about the 2021 part. The technology sub tree alone is [I]massive[/I], I am afraid that we couldn't achieve 10% of it this year. There is a lot of hard, time consuming stuff there. Each single leaf of the tree could occupy a single person full time. I am pretty certain that the objectives will remain exactly the same in 2022 because we won't have achieved much of all of this, which kind of weaken the value of framing it as a "roadmap for 2021". Also I am afraid the document won't be taken very seriously because it's too stretched (besides Bitcoin or Ethereum I don't think any blockchain would be able to tackle so many things btw).
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top