Post #31318

39c531bd8491d39f5855c3a69f6339f1d622fbe1771879cdf7e3f6c0249463e8
9a6440f30a2aa037ddd1443eb706f14e7196a3ab1763e53e68c5f1c3a955d5da
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1610705188,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"5529286257a5be3d9b6333c195a8e140cd374866172fc23e6526383d3d37050b319cd81dc1c54641277283e4a87548717423899cd34871a1fac42db59e5b92bf","node_id":52,"post_date":1610705188,"thread_id":5633,"user_id":32},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/proposed-factom-roadmap-for-2021.5633\/post-31318"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Proposed Factom Objectives
[QUOTE="Niels Klomp, post: 31315, member: 8"] So I agree some of it is already more or less in the pipeline. It simply is missing the distinction in layers a bit and the fact that the protocol itself is not really responsible for all of it. [/QUOTE]

Yes, proposed objectives are not strictly limited to L1 features, the majority are not.

Yes, many of these things are are already in various phases of work. That is intentional and nested in the intent of 2021 being a housecleaning year of getting the many and diverse efforts underway completed to give the community a broad and attractive base to build from and further enable focus to specific use cases.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top