Post #31352

39c531bd8491d39f5855c3a69f6339f1d622fbe1771879cdf7e3f6c0249463e8
d3d08711727509b720387fae3423d6ae0e5b5ab5b4f012a6a3fc2f8fc36d5074
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1610840607,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"3a4d8a665717df690027104a84247917c949e08ef244649092f92f4fe69a92e95d8b443df8aee199a6ce41fa3eb80751e1fa2ed9b88247f1e767fbd5013f435a","node_id":52,"post_date":1610840608,"thread_id":5633,"user_id":32},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/proposed-factom-roadmap-for-2021.5633\/post-31352"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Proposed Factom Objectives
[QUOTE="Colin Campbell, post: 31321, member: 22"]
I do think it’s a positive to put this out there and simply label it “what we’re working towards” or “soft objectives” rather than we “will complete all this things to production grade.”

We can discuss and design all these features in 2021, so that is progress.

Jason, it’s simply describing this a bit differently to what is feasible.
[/QUOTE]

We can do this and much is already underway.

This plan has huge value in marshaling the community behind a way forward and in our ability to clearly communicate to the community and beyond of all the great things we’re working towards.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top