Post #31354

39c531bd8491d39f5855c3a69f6339f1d622fbe1771879cdf7e3f6c0249463e8
180f4cf60cddd8f2da33f87df546dc55e03e9bf306ee84071d0c6b8e18ea19aa
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1610893913,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"b42ef867281fbdf206d29fa5264e9d7247f1d22264723502af45ef4dab1b6bdf0182d3a8c6302211ba125594e90c0a1225d754d253c74775a32c8e543bdbe66f","node_id":52,"post_date":1610893913,"thread_id":5633,"user_id":11},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/proposed-factom-roadmap-for-2021.5633\/post-31354"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Proposed Factom Objectives
I have no way to accurately assess whether these are realistic targets. I do not know how much progress has been made, what is actively being planned, or how much work is left to do.

I do not want to undermine those who are making progress, but I also do not want to advance a plan that I believe might give any potential FCT holder unrealistic expectations. As such, Factoshi will abstain.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top