Post #31356

39c531bd8491d39f5855c3a69f6339f1d622fbe1771879cdf7e3f6c0249463e8
9590ae9af0f7c84651d94ab9848035a457cf4303542ac3fef0ff84e08cadbb93
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1610895322,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"f32b3fd4876098246ac8c9b8174a33b442f3baf694565b25321b2b1d24f2a0750c2243418328f16051ef6af91cb38d51fc26800a6cd7457a0834579595dcceac","node_id":52,"post_date":1610895322,"thread_id":5633,"user_id":11},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/proposed-factom-roadmap-for-2021.5633\/post-31356"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Proposed Factom Objectives
Yes, I believe an opened ended timeline would more accurately communicate the uncertainty inherent in our current circumstance. Factoshi would vote in favour should the time element be removed.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top