Post #31359

e81a4b0c081090804aa7dce1ecc436f1ebd31bf3d3ea06fa1b84a3a930b9b734
1d1b58e5fa83b9d602cb251bd7555f44791967bf2e501e04bb9bf7bb90ace40f
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1610910815,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"a57be8f16a4732073c283dd74c8cf6860a21c453727f83f3c027ec848c42533d2b460700b159da02edbf4b227aec7fa9a3da776eb1728773be77406f8bf6afa8","node_id":52,"post_date":1610910815,"thread_id":5637,"user_id":56},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/batched-amendment-strategy-and-resource-director-proposal.5637\/post-31359"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Batched Amendment - Strategy and Resource Director Proposal
I will have more thoughts later, but I tentatively support this model. I think there are some important distinctions between types of "decentralization" that factom has gotten wrong in the past, and I'm interested in this model to fix some of those.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top