Post #31383

e81a4b0c081090804aa7dce1ecc436f1ebd31bf3d3ea06fa1b84a3a930b9b734
786c5de498cf3ced11c6197727e853f87bae8ac46a38e4283e2c3ac4a9fae8e1
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1611000180,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"0238f5375c206cbb6e85d2ee1e38e1b2bc86937e8409460358abb2c2ff057be9cea069e2d311a47165d1aaa4342202517637ade86f937ed940fc236c25d725e3","node_id":52,"post_date":1611000180,"thread_id":5637,"user_id":8},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/batched-amendment-strategy-and-resource-director-proposal.5637\/post-31383"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Batched Amendment - Strategy and Resource Director Proposal
Thx [USER=9]@Matt Osborne[/USER] , I will happily share my vision about a director approach. I will split that up in 2 parts. More like a management summary, for people that do not have the time and/or energy to read everything. I will write that down ASAP, but I am happily giving the word to the Council approach proponents first. My approach would be very much like a traditional interim management approach backed by a very experienced Management Team with members that ran at C-Level in international companies and for instance a top 100 biggest company in the Netherlands, ensuring we do not just jump into something without having a proper vision, strategy and constantly verifying every single decision to see whether it fits the strategy. That is also why I have been saying we are doing things in the wrong order. If I would be voted director, I guess I can prove why you want to change it around.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top