Post #31385

e81a4b0c081090804aa7dce1ecc436f1ebd31bf3d3ea06fa1b84a3a930b9b734
5b5ef14f91452720041df2967885810077fa81f13bfeabc58a41093dc0427f11
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1611006295,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"37777bfb81cdaf6d211a8213ba6fda80d91bda534d3e778a4b1e1e6d287fa39fa1598c962b794b24869b54b334e00116da9b3339fdbb1c2d26f8630e04ccc104","node_id":52,"post_date":1611006295,"thread_id":5637,"user_id":9},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/batched-amendment-strategy-and-resource-director-proposal.5637\/post-31385"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Batched Amendment - Strategy and Resource Director Proposal
[QUOTE="WB, post: 31384, member: 175"]
I do have a preference for any leadership having a zero or otherwise very limited role in selecting those groups to keep that oversight as strong as it can be.
[/QUOTE]
100% agree. Happy to update the proposal to make this more clear. Suggestions welcome!
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top