Post #31400

e81a4b0c081090804aa7dce1ecc436f1ebd31bf3d3ea06fa1b84a3a930b9b734
bc4354d8d0c3c37ea574df165abbcfb9935d9d8f3b067cbc57746af641f1081a
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1611167571,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"9b5fdec7403e1287520f0e1ee794a3edc5491869859f354d42ca48fc9a36d18502e3c11d86c5bb5a408bda2e38d324289f9d8e2d74ded9685aacd5c07bcdaf92","node_id":52,"post_date":1611167571,"thread_id":5637,"user_id":8},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/batched-amendment-strategy-and-resource-director-proposal.5637\/post-31400"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Batched Amendment - Strategy and Resource Director Proposal
Interesting that a proven mechanism of leadership is portrayed as idealism. A director brings clarity, direction and certainly will not result in second guessing every step of the way, not because I would be a dictator. Simply because I am capable of the analysis, creating proper plans, executing them.

Will there be some parties or people that do not agree? For sure, but that is even more the case when you bring in more decision makers without proper leadership structures in place.

The indecisiveness and lack of clarity already shows quite clearly in this thread, which brings me to the next point:

[USER=175]@WB[/USER] You decided to accept the nomination for the director position. Let's assume this ammendment makes it and you would get elected as Director.

What would be the exact difference with the council approach of which you are a co-creator and proponent from the GWG?


PS. I can give the remuneration figure I would seek at this moment if you want.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top