Post #31404

e81a4b0c081090804aa7dce1ecc436f1ebd31bf3d3ea06fa1b84a3a930b9b734
8bf3625ab87c43b83044d4825c585174f111f3fec5a4b4d66a22f4cbcc45883f
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1611256458,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"2102374c7cb004eda6404b1b5bb84002316458a7776345b254b9b9d901d6cbd8869897db78511fc0f08605d8198a8cb0a8dabed8430bf8203c9105cb9e9fb9a4","node_id":52,"post_date":1611256458,"thread_id":5637,"user_id":117},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/batched-amendment-strategy-and-resource-director-proposal.5637\/post-31404"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Batched Amendment - Strategy and Resource Director Proposal
Digressing a bit from director vs council: [USER=9]@Matt Osborne[/USER] I note that in your proposal it says "The Director will not be able to override decisions made by Committees designated by the Factom Governance". So would the director instance have no say in how the website is maintained? I get that the director should not be able to push changes such as tokenomics or demotion onto the servers, but is that wording not limiting the director quite a lot?
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top