Post #31405

e81a4b0c081090804aa7dce1ecc436f1ebd31bf3d3ea06fa1b84a3a930b9b734
e69ad584530d678551e2b4a0f13feb1270a3d20bfbf3dae2c7f511d3614670ea
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1611256541,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"83e2ec17f20d5e54bdb2d0a50ba6054ee00b18c3b09faf69ac4c8698baf333c1be959d5e56f7c79fcd38c73e8948118e50c81f73603f38441310e7d3a53d291f","node_id":52,"post_date":1611256541,"thread_id":5637,"user_id":117},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/batched-amendment-strategy-and-resource-director-proposal.5637\/post-31405"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Batched Amendment - Strategy and Resource Director Proposal
This discussion ends on Sunday. Would it be timely for someone who can, to do a motion for extension already now?
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top