The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.
Batched Amendment - Strategy and Resource Director Proposal
[QUOTE="Hinamatsuri, post: 31403, member: 117"]
Case in point, Niels was already able to draw up a plan for the coming months. With a council we would first have to elect a council, then have them agree on such a plan.
Don't we have to elect a Director as well?
I don't see the big deal. We seem to be thriving on the idea that we'll have a council of two idiots forever arguing with the 'expert.' ;) Who's honestly going to argue with Niels and the plan he has? He'll get to do that straight away and be supported left and right.
It's far easier to follow through with a supported plan inside a small team. We've tried the single party approach before. It's called the grant system. One party presents a fantastic plan, and ultimately not much becomes of it. If anything's a slight variation, [USER=413]@Nate Miller[/USER] - it's that.
Did I ever gridlock on anything with [USER=11]@Alex[/USER] when I was in Factoshi? Not really. Did I ever gridlock on anything in the GWG - which touched on some of the most heated topics you could imagine? Not really.
[QUOTE="Matt Osborne, post: 31401, member: 9"]
If there's a way to modify this proposal prior to vote so it could also potentially incorporate what the GWG envisions (as well as what the Director approach envisions) and have the approach be decided by an election, then let's 100% do it! Does this sound good to you?
Working on it now - will be here tomorrow!