Post #31408

e81a4b0c081090804aa7dce1ecc436f1ebd31bf3d3ea06fa1b84a3a930b9b734
bf234bf10b62511f5c8823914cbf20685d5b3452899462daf4e8389b5d8e9f1f
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1611258315,"post_data":{"edit_count":1,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"d9250911bfdd2bf79d0b090fefa406a69494893261a8b2ca2f0db2b171501b5190828007ccdafbdc4985516d4731071d392eb0f9ad3a776cd34a8e43d0c9da3d","node_id":52,"post_date":1611258274,"thread_id":5637,"user_id":175},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/batched-amendment-strategy-and-resource-director-proposal.5637\/post-31408"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Batched Amendment - Strategy and Resource Director Proposal
[QUOTE="Hinamatsuri, post: 31403, member: 117"]
If the 3 council members each have their own area of expertise then what would happen if two members disagree to something that is going on in within the last members area? Should they then sort it out amongst themselves or should the area of expertise bring a stronger mandate? In the first case we would lose some of the decisiveness in the latter case it would be a bit like having three directors (which might work).
[/QUOTE]

It's the second. We elect three peers. Within their respective authorities, they can't be overruled. There will be grey areas for sure, but they'll be less important if they're not captured as an authority anyway. There will be similar grey areas with a Director and ANOs doing work.

Overall strategy would immediately go to the most technically oriented person - because Factom is a technology product.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top