Post #31505

e81a4b0c081090804aa7dce1ecc436f1ebd31bf3d3ea06fa1b84a3a930b9b734
4a43b02d0a5cf31961f1be8a357da538186214c1d2a73cab7f18ef71693f09ae
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1611751713,"post_data":{"edit_count":2,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"ea08ed7d8afc51b76d0991a0763b7a28e2be029aaa49e7fedeabf826fd7ac5c0a5b2f7f5f406d6da71e32c411e53c634551bc785428ee871877b7a8e726811f7","node_id":52,"post_date":1611751666,"thread_id":5637,"user_id":35},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/batched-amendment-strategy-and-resource-director-proposal.5637\/post-31505"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Batched Amendment - Strategy and Resource Director Proposal
I think having the board and the director is a good approach for the protocol.

My thoughts:

1. From my experience of participating in different workgroups, [B]the board should not be too large[/B], otherwise people are not actively participating. I would suggest 6 people board + 1 director

2. [B]Board members should be compensated as well[/B] (not big amount of money, of course, the compensation is needed to keep people involved in management on daily basis)

3. [B]Director and board members are elected[/B] [B]and[/B] [B]re-elected[/B] (for the future periods) [B]by ANOs[/B]

4. We should [B]use Factom Protocol forum[/B] (or maybe [B]Reddit[/B] is better to show that protocol is alive?) for public communications and discussions by the board members and director.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top