Post #31509

e81a4b0c081090804aa7dce1ecc436f1ebd31bf3d3ea06fa1b84a3a930b9b734
bc58c135f42b077d39e26f3e7b9a672a19b1784d8e664c52d26d3b6339839472
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1611944187,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"e8c22fdbc6215d8cf2402c388d1eaabec189e668ea99871b346d414f7b80b38742df2b1ecc5f031682818b19278ec41f62282ca85e81154091d57ad658d4d079","node_id":52,"post_date":1611944187,"thread_id":5637,"user_id":11},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/batched-amendment-strategy-and-resource-director-proposal.5637\/post-31509"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Batched Amendment - Strategy and Resource Director Proposal
How's progress on the new draft coming along?
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top