Post #31511

e81a4b0c081090804aa7dce1ecc436f1ebd31bf3d3ea06fa1b84a3a930b9b734
f460229970f4ec96c82dd7fe59acbadf727a054c5251c7215f88ddfed57b58b2
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1611954182,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"2a19c89bd582acdab8685fbbe32c718a9f2d103c5b98205ec467b8aaa94085963d5a25f302634913dae97a2b2a773b53ba811f3faa713fca2a2ca29a69dfbc7d","node_id":52,"post_date":1611954182,"thread_id":5637,"user_id":9},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/batched-amendment-strategy-and-resource-director-proposal.5637\/post-31511"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Batched Amendment - Strategy and Resource Director Proposal
Thank You for everyone's patience!

Great news, we were able to find a middle ground and put together a document that we think will work for everyone.

Huge thanks to [USER=175]@WB[/USER] for taking the lead on this revamp.

[URL='https://docs.google.com/document/d/16jQiL7YxbKrVr69LTOMZ2VJcc77s1qgMFDQoOF5H6cA/edit?usp=sharing']Here is the updated document[/URL]. I would suggest reading through it in its entirety.

Note: I am editing my initial post of this thread to point to the new Doc 008.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top