Post #31514

e81a4b0c081090804aa7dce1ecc436f1ebd31bf3d3ea06fa1b84a3a930b9b734
20a4510a59c9ef9bb4959d625e1ebfdbc2d1174470ed3d13deafa1002cf4bcc9
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1612001177,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"1587f4919557c22162e723674738ef02572b6deeb50eedb63c4627e8265010e27246c594de04f14800e1711f98b75041a85a5552dc9e0801d5b4f96ae625953d","node_id":52,"post_date":1612001177,"thread_id":5637,"user_id":175},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/batched-amendment-strategy-and-resource-director-proposal.5637\/post-31514"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Batched Amendment - Strategy and Resource Director Proposal
This has been very constructive. I support this proposal and to me it satisfies the five principles I outlined earlier this week.

It solves concerns I had about continuity. If a Director steps down, instead of falling back to nothing we have an entity (council) that likely persists and is tasked with protecting the long-term interests of the protocol. That same Council plays a large role in Director appointments, allowing for effective recruiting policy. The Director has a great deal of autonomy in strategy and carrying out the day-to-day and will have an easier time consulting with a small council than with 18+ ANOs. Meanwhile, ANOs still have ultimate authority.

A lot of the dynamics here will be explored and discovered as we do this. That was always inevitable. Given the time constraints we were under, and the need to finally make change happen, I'm happy.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top