Post #31516

e81a4b0c081090804aa7dce1ecc436f1ebd31bf3d3ea06fa1b84a3a930b9b734
1d15b520825066be0bf1af0f544730096c5b80213bdb1e8e34da6c8419ce2925
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1612016381,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"b38966dff3ae9547e77b1200f0de3fb1accabd085c4bcc748382e17144b546ea58b2921d472f9d5eb2cec43565c8e5cd67e9d2ca37e16605d9c7bfc3c67e094d","node_id":52,"post_date":1612016381,"thread_id":5637,"user_id":11},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/batched-amendment-strategy-and-resource-director-proposal.5637\/post-31516"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Batched Amendment - Strategy and Resource Director Proposal
Sections 3.3.5.3 and 3.3.5.4 should perhaps be subsections of 3.3.5.2.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top