Post #31517

e81a4b0c081090804aa7dce1ecc436f1ebd31bf3d3ea06fa1b84a3a930b9b734
ba4053613b80ad917b8d721a9a1d0d569344c0d3c793600ffa9cdc2b08c23f42
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1612016922,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"a4bbceaec7b26a6a5f467f9e56db862acc0f4e52097e91fb44f911f4267ce2403259d049e049a8e749b6c8442d1ff8f9bf4624ade0f8101b4a006be618ae8cf4","node_id":52,"post_date":1612016922,"thread_id":5637,"user_id":11},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/batched-amendment-strategy-and-resource-director-proposal.5637\/post-31517"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Batched Amendment - Strategy and Resource Director Proposal
It looks good to me. Thanks for the hard work that has gone into it and thank you for finding middle ground and compromise. I feel hopeful that we will be able to finally move forwards again.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top