Post #31778

27242b556317d204596bb20c828b2ed7c843d7fa6bd601e88b0688f001b442da
4ebd0a46472db91bf3e5f348d0404e566064c7145c1c942203fb816bbd58b47f
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1613386721,"post_data":{"edit_count":2,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"1a06286255b86afa45d968d6112cae19b7367b4bb194d7854fd0070c2931209a410f692b721301ee5aaa3aa40df212a7a408fb79c4dbf46a7788f89c78490f92","node_id":115,"post_date":1613386495,"thread_id":5666,"user_id":175},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/sphereon-bv-niels-klomp.5666\/post-31778"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
[Sphereon BV] Niels Klomp
[QUOTE="Niels Klomp, post: 31776, member: 8"]
An organization makes their own decisions and provides their own accountability. It is different roles. Something quite easily to get a grip on tbh.
[/QUOTE]

Can you expand if / how you tried to influence Sphereon's decision-making about grant reporting? Where does Sphereon's policy differ from your personal policy in a Director role?

[QUOTE="Niels Klomp, post: 31776, member: 8"]
That is how the business world works.
[/QUOTE]

I don't really care about who argues with who and how much. This is about optics and not setting dangerous precedents for the future. Does Factom have a Director? Yes. Who oversees that Director? ANOs. Does the Director have financial ties with multiple ANOs? Yes.

I'm not sure if "that's how business works" will sway public opinion anywhere outside our little bubble. We've had ANOs abstaining from votes before due to perceived conflicts. Some of the first Guide/ANO elections come to mind. Generally that's a good thing.

So again, would you support that any parties with direct financial ties to the Director abstain from voting?

[QUOTE="Niels Klomp, post: 31776, member: 8"]
BIF acts on its own. Everytime we have a discussion you seem to think I am a sole decision maker in BIF.
[/QUOTE]

This isn't about legal accountability. This is about how one role may influence how other parties interact with your other roles (and entities associated therewith). The more roles you assume, the more likely that is. And you have a lot. This whole switcheroo (it's not my problem, it's yours for not recognizing different roles!) is therefore irrelevant. It's about the dynamics we're promoting and allowing.

Will you continue to respond on BIF's behalf (after reaching majority within) to standing votes? Just yes or no will do.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top