Post #31821

27242b556317d204596bb20c828b2ed7c843d7fa6bd601e88b0688f001b442da
e61b5eafa88a62bd68e354376b236736d2632420904d7a03b20c9fdb3895818f
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1613509412,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"b70f246e9cd3acf8e62211ab2465306d87310d003ca70f101a3dfffaeb95d0efad13c72619f4896ea5bb030e6cc213a548d54ffa9d13d1b3edac1c1d9ee4a157","node_id":115,"post_date":1613509412,"thread_id":5666,"user_id":8},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/sphereon-bv-niels-klomp.5666\/post-31821"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
[Sphereon BV] Niels Klomp
Pretty much, except that the council gives the OK for the director budget, and that the director ensures the allocation gets done, with obvious full transparency to the board. In order to ensure a proper sustainable road ahead, it is to be expected that the director would like to create a legal entity in the form of a non-profit for next leadership. Obviously without removing the eventual power from standing parties. It would also make sense to put some roles (which could be part-time) in that entity.

One of the bigger problems is continuity. Especially in bad times. We have seen a big outflux and that is something to prevent. That can be formed in multiple ways, but that also ties into the amount of resources available to the protocol, which in turn is reliant on the tokenomics, which in turn is reliant on the other plans. Just sketching the outlines here.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top