Post #31827

24f816136ea74076ee5970bc38b3c63fb2574ef678e66a91c0260f902490a134
202f411b61c0d81ac682ec9f8fa1c0fa2186c3d6cc7557404029ae8d52172bef
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1613681540,"post_data":{"edit_count":2,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"028899c7a2ed2a97177ea1b96cb4ed3ae2835d26ce16273acb03e4247b0e93b2834f04caaa32d23ac5d960d69a37a857938d220886476cd42c6f4d18576444fb","node_id":52,"post_date":1613681363,"thread_id":5673,"user_id":29},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/2021-1-factom-protocol-director-election.5673\/post-31827"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
2021-1 Factom Protocol Director Election
[QUOTE="Nate Miller, post: 31825, member: 413"]
We've got a quorum and a definite majority for Niels, I believe he's already won
[/QUOTE]
That's what I'd expect, sort of. It does imply quite a bit of back channel coordination to say that this election process is just a formality. Or maybe a quorum voted him in, and can see the results. I haven't voted, so I don't know.

I'd hope [USER=8]@Niels Klomp[/USER] would still be obligated to do at least a bit of campaigning to be elected. Particularly interesting to me would be how he intends to handle funds, avoid making Factom an SEC target, how he is going to set protocol priorities, how we are going to avoid possible regulatory issues with the use of funds he will be distributing.

Basically a summery of all the past discussions plus more details about what to expect from him over the short term and long term.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top