Post #31832

24f816136ea74076ee5970bc38b3c63fb2574ef678e66a91c0260f902490a134
0c82b3837089f8029a80647c857fbc1e3decb7e99f261998585c09567d495a03
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1613756919,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"4fe1a5753c2be55b80f456dc5607b77a6ec759e3ea54bcfe729fffec384465f425f59edc4d2bdd0e3cf67c27f13e3371132a4efa2ef7fe770af6fecb59e95411","node_id":52,"post_date":1613756919,"thread_id":5673,"user_id":117},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/2021-1-factom-protocol-director-election.5673\/post-31832"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
2021-1 Factom Protocol Director Election
[QUOTE="PaulSnow, post: 31829, member: 29"]
Fair enough.

I think a Director could work, but I think running the protocol as [USER=8]@Niels Klomp[/USER] suggests isn't very workable. Questions about Liability, regulation, grants, vision, developer recruitment/retention, taxes, etc. remain.
[/QUOTE]
What in Niels’ approach is it you think is not really workable?
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top