Post #31834

24f816136ea74076ee5970bc38b3c63fb2574ef678e66a91c0260f902490a134
b7bebd7fa19c652cd5f4727acc2c73b70dfd883cf878dc26f295d5797ec323ed
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1613759616,"post_data":{"edit_count":1,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"0c7099895544d7333cd1a17fa8c34a756c9f13bffb6403c97ca9c5b5b4f215ed0402f0125647c98797de914936b11208455545ef2022a960a571e0fa87c8a5dd","node_id":52,"post_date":1613759596,"thread_id":5673,"user_id":175},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/2021-1-factom-protocol-director-election.5673\/post-31834"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
2021-1 Factom Protocol Director Election
I agree we've been glossing over things like liability and regulation too quickly, so let's not start dismissing these just because we don't like the rest of the message. I'd welcome some legal advice once certain roles are in place, if only to help protect those who're actually stepping forward and taking the risk.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top