Post #31946

d71f7c6d72b75d99eed18e7423636635c4957c5b04b8d2c6f973021259014686
f88a2e59e0025dc9359006dcfc0fb5e03894597486d98698d26ffe4722bb989e
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1618143253,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"26d05e45a752412e1c9882372dcd5461e41514adf1b518427d20a458edfbd3e778effb10d08598236dd58d2fb7e567dfeb63335d0e07eea47b7ad27aef9cddf6","node_id":59,"post_date":1618143253,"thread_id":5705,"user_id":227},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/ano-application.5705\/post-31946"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
ANO Application
[QUOTE="Hinamatsuri, post: 31939, member: 117"]
Have @mboender @Alex @Matthias Fortin @Paul B. @Jason Gregoire @Saul Schwartzbach @Miguel Proulx and @Nolan Bauer seen this post? :) You are the ANOs that are yet to give an initial vote.

Also I did not forget TFA, I just wrote them directly on their Discord :)
[/QUOTE]
Hi Hinamatsuri,
Yes we have seen it and we are temporising while the Director/Niels is performing his analysis of the current state of the protocol and defining the next protocol priorities.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top