Post #31955

d71f7c6d72b75d99eed18e7423636635c4957c5b04b8d2c6f973021259014686
b299c6bc402e782e225c201cfe0e4a799302a6933d682f91ed068995a7e092c4
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1618360779,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"d7e332c57ac7efc2ff4fa69c5acf34093f7fb827ca483bf48e9103205fb5348f4ff2612a9521c0f33759cc19d531491c6f331e4a4f3f6d84c897b466112d3fa4","node_id":59,"post_date":1618360779,"thread_id":5705,"user_id":10},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/ano-application.5705\/post-31955"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
ANO Application
Hey, yes I have seen this post. To be frank I don't have a strong inclination in either direction. Nothing personal but we have had quite many ANO applications of people saying they [I]will [/I]build something and incorporate, which didn't realize in all cases. Hence I will also wait for some insight from the Factom Director.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top