Post #31956

d71f7c6d72b75d99eed18e7423636635c4957c5b04b8d2c6f973021259014686
6bb29b435f5e633fd22ce0b48c898e98b6361a6dbc73e279dded83d4a6d2df40
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1618361004,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"6ab7a9600d31074495355b16ce3824f629808d7abe191cedb7d0c33f1e910e6e740247026c8e8f9edf4fb0d2dc4b4fb0768d99b45af6c9beea50cfc8ebcd9f7a","node_id":59,"post_date":1618361004,"thread_id":5705,"user_id":17},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/ano-application.5705\/post-31956"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
ANO Application
Understandable Paul. As strange as it might be from me in this case, I think disagreement is healthy. I hope you change your standing support when we come online.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top