Post #32002

d71f7c6d72b75d99eed18e7423636635c4957c5b04b8d2c6f973021259014686
33ad5512029098e6807d07d3eee097ce915645129d995e70f15e7aeb4e45b848
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1624676123,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"cff9f451c40a6ec5516ba7fa96066ac860b6a6387e77999be14943af1df1115de8aa0301192dcc95bee1d19a42da19d8d02cbb207a46d98deede04319f05542b","node_id":59,"post_date":1624676123,"thread_id":5705,"user_id":17},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/ano-application.5705\/post-32002"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
ANO Application
Strange. I will have to revisit that questionnaire. We are aiming for 1 testnet server.

We haven't brought up our Authority servers yet. These servers are to be run out of operating funds. Those funds are finally becoming available, but we decided not to bring the servers up until the money was available instead of the possibility of money. If this company fails for some reason, I would expect standing to be removed. Removing standing is easier and with less risk to the network as an administrative function than as a technical one. That test server date was when I expected the server to be acquired and activated.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top