Post #32155

59dfdc4e5c0fb1e98276bb0e605420746df8517c8892e6a8ae313e005a6083de
124c80d3c32413810b935c3afc786d9374c9418e0e28046c2eed26cade036e01
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1630046341,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"8193bfcaaf6759bcaff929dedee8e8156a61a511e6b40b1a9f8db75b7fffb1d39921a137ff29cd9ddf4558f546eee6160b4f80a31583ee302675eca09dbdbc86","node_id":52,"post_date":1630046342,"thread_id":5761,"user_id":214},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/do-we-agree-in-general-with-the-analysis-as-created-by-the-director.5761\/post-32155"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Do we agree in general with the analysis as created by the director?
We are now 18 hours into the discussion. If you have taken part in the thread, you may now make a motion to extend this Major Discussion by 72 hours or end this conversation by selecting the pertinent button at the top of this thread. This option will end when there are 24 hours left in the discussion.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top