Post #32157

630fb4308d4f83c1a5ca088a5ac36d6bacd2838a1437e009adf587a0b2a5e3a3
09db03f40a46754c29a54480487fac8ffdfa079d7215b357ae9ea9641be4bed2
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1630157024,"post_data":{"edit_count":2,"last_edit_date":1630157024,"last_edit_user_id":22,"message_sha512":"0ec29bfb9ae0d4289148d4ace8f747719b94fd501cc19dc9138fdaf5f7087cc9d1810cf0e3abbe0090afb80bc3433dbb3efde726b218e4e048585f474f15450e","node_id":52,"post_date":1630110088,"thread_id":5762,"user_id":22},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/do-we-agree-with-the-proposed-mission-and-vission.5762\/post-32157"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Do we agree with the proposed mission and vission?
The mission and vision are quite developer focussed. While that may indeed be the technical direction, we also need a mission and vision from an application standpoint.

This answers “how do we do it”, before “what do we want to achieve”.

I.e Will this technical direction prohibit certain use cases?

Do we really want to put all our hopes and resources into a niche market for anchoring/securing data?

Given the chance at a restart, shouldn’t we build an ecosystem that every person and every company will find value in? Something people are excited to both use and invest in?

E.g We are ideally placed to become an L2 for ETH/BTC, an efficient DeFi platform, or an NFT mint/marketplace.

These are markets we can quickly gain funding, developers, community and traction for well before a finished product.

Again, maybe the first step is indeed the shared technical direction. I’m interested to hear what applications will and will not be possible with 2.0.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top