Post #32158

630fb4308d4f83c1a5ca088a5ac36d6bacd2838a1437e009adf587a0b2a5e3a3
a520e8ab5f879c8b4262b35469d728df7de604a1fa70f4abbae6f25c02c744a9
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1630145766,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"860fd84df806c23ae3d719e3626f8a4fc2323d10ec5e84e178e174c1cb6fcb67b709596f5e6fb519db8e51e5d2de2bea9dcbb925619ecb09bcd9e938f2815acd","node_id":52,"post_date":1630145766,"thread_id":5762,"user_id":11},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/do-we-agree-with-the-proposed-mission-and-vission.5762\/post-32158"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Do we agree with the proposed mission and vission?
I agree with Colin. Reading through both this and the technical document, I still don't entirely understand why anyone would want to use the network. What does the application layer look like? What does Factom offer that people need? What problem is being solved?
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top