Post #32162

59dfdc4e5c0fb1e98276bb0e605420746df8517c8892e6a8ae313e005a6083de
9f6703ce3580c3d8bf45c71dfd87af3773c0b6287a32dc851b6efaae224520f6
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1630586341,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"f9e70135667377fe726e6f76ff9da5e4467bccdcbc503222e783ce8a53a85937638759b8e3bbb1ca179d806e55da3c1f4662a5de01f8f29b4cc78b19f00bab68","node_id":52,"post_date":1630586343,"thread_id":5761,"user_id":214},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/do-we-agree-in-general-with-the-analysis-as-created-by-the-director.5761\/post-32162"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Do we agree in general with the analysis as created by the director?
There are now less than 24 hours remaining. You may no longer make a motion to end or extend the discussion.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top