Post #32165

59dfdc4e5c0fb1e98276bb0e605420746df8517c8892e6a8ae313e005a6083de
aa9d27f841193c0c39e5187b3969437c1f0121271d35818b3408f1245e25a370
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1630672801,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"ada8314c9795d08cedf8fa7c588524b7d140cdbaa7e29afc2727ebe811122ec47c42ac757de6b2fb5b6408194fb242dcc4bb4087a3afcd1c7ea5a5b90a051ef0","node_id":52,"post_date":1630672802,"thread_id":5761,"user_id":214},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/do-we-agree-in-general-with-the-analysis-as-created-by-the-director.5761\/post-32165"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Do we agree in general with the analysis as created by the director?
Discussion has ended and the final vote is now open. It will last for 72 hours. Please take the time to vote accordingly.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top