Post #32169

59dfdc4e5c0fb1e98276bb0e605420746df8517c8892e6a8ae313e005a6083de
96dc04dcace113c7b5a211fd2a83fdfbeeff1da035e0a51183bd080388bbdfaf
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1630931942,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"623ac5f9dc50e5582fa0d786d48c7ef2df093009c39f3e5b8c604c141e645365e2ffcc9119af44be9734a63d9c91e8d2b9d6f118f7ffbd0919989b3c2426acc2","node_id":52,"post_date":1630931942,"thread_id":5761,"user_id":214},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/do-we-agree-in-general-with-the-analysis-as-created-by-the-director.5761\/post-32169"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Do we agree in general with the analysis as created by the director?
The vote has now closed. Thank you.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top