Post #32170

630fb4308d4f83c1a5ca088a5ac36d6bacd2838a1437e009adf587a0b2a5e3a3
2b111c2380a7340daca1da2cd8b9cf50afd02fc426276b4c4f793ffddf2867f1
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1630932301,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"623ac5f9dc50e5582fa0d786d48c7ef2df093009c39f3e5b8c604c141e645365e2ffcc9119af44be9734a63d9c91e8d2b9d6f118f7ffbd0919989b3c2426acc2","node_id":52,"post_date":1630932302,"thread_id":5762,"user_id":214},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/do-we-agree-with-the-proposed-mission-and-vission.5762\/post-32170"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Do we agree with the proposed mission and vission?
The vote has now closed. Thank you.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top