Post #32207

cb3cb761413c4a39944e8c0ad269d93117aa927f7676cd66de2784ce36f0d49d
e588c19db4d3fe4358d76c7c74cac83770c55ec934b4d3c355763eede6a0e3ac
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1633941277,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"c73849180485e4368adeb3e51d137b7758be1c312ac3eebf9f74466e752d3361fc07eced0130ac7e9487ccc68d1938f9364ad16481606a7c2fdc824fcf48d8cd","node_id":52,"post_date":1633941277,"thread_id":5784,"user_id":164},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/share-fct-inflation-with-token-holders-via-wfct-staking.5784\/post-32207"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Share FCT inflation with token holders via WFCT staking
Hi Anton,

Firstly [B]thank you[/B] for the initiative. Getting Factom more involved in DeFi seems a good move to me. I would like to reflect on your proposal and certainly would like to hear others views. Just a few quick questions for now:

What do you think the opportunity cost of committing 27% of FCT monthly inflation would be? In other words what might we forego if we were to do this?

How practical is it to vary the size of the pool? Could we increase in some months and reduce in others dependent on our needs?
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top